Features
The U.K.’s Music Venue Trust’s Mark Davyd On Saving The Future Of Live Music: European Live Savers Issue
– Mark Davyd
Just how much the world benefits from grassroots music venues has become particularly apparent since March, when governments seemingly decided that a venue filled to capacity poses a greater health risk than, say, a plane filled to capacity. The gap left in peoples’ private and professional lives by the ban on live music is painfully wide. But that’s not all: grassroots music venues are the breeding grounds for some of the greatest live acts of all time. Name any one great live performer, and you can be sure they started out in a beautifully dingy underground venue, probably in front of a meager crowd, getting paid with free beer.
Dave Hogan / Getty Images –
The Rolling Stones at the 100 Club, London, in 1980, one of many venues facing closure due to the UK’s COVID restrictions, before the Music Venue Trust intervened.
“I don’t think there’s a member of the team that hasn’t had to deal with a tearful phone call. There’s been people who are very, very close to the edge. We deal with people who live in their venue. When you say, ‘Their venue’s closing down,’ you mean, ‘They’re going to lose their home.’ That’s pretty serious,” Davyd explained. “We’re kind of blasé with big numbers, but actually the individual story of each of these venues is pretty big stuff. We’ve done a lot of work to prevent the closure of the Dublin Castle, for instance, but it’s not just the Dublin Castle. Henry, who runs it now, his mom used to run it, it’s been in the family since 1972. It’s not as simple as stopping a venue from closing down, they’re risking an entire family legacy. The pressure on somebody like Henry to keep that venue going, not only for the local community, but also because it’s his family business.”
He continued, “Jeff of the 100 Club, his family’s been there since 1964, his father ran it, and before that his auntie ran it. You’re talking about real heritage, deeply emotive situations that people are in. Each one of these venues is somebody’s personal history and life’s work. You threaten to take that away from them, of course it gets personal. We talk about the music industry a lot, but a lot of this is just about communities and people. I’m very proud of what we’ve done for people, that’s it.”Back in April, when many people still thought this whole crisis would be over in no time, the MVT had already developed four different protocols of how to bring live music back.
Samir Hussein / Getty Images –
Amy Winehouse at Dublin Castle as part of The Camden Crawl in April 2007 in London.
Getting politicians on board, however, turned out to be a drag. A lot of the discussions between the government and the venues working group Davyd is a part of revolved around ventilation.
“You’re allowed to do more outside than you’re allowed to do inside. So, at one point I asked, scientifically speaking, what is the level of ventilation [to recreate] the conditions outside? If a venue could create those conditions inside, would it not be allowed to do what you’re allowed to do outdoors? To which the answer was, ‘No’,” Davyd explained, adding, “A lot of the government position and advice on this virus isn’t as scientifically based as you might hope it would be. A lot of it is about a public narrative. I do get that, but at the same time there’s a number of proposals being made, where very sensible scientific risk management isn’t picked up. There’s a disconnect there.” That has been showing forever. Grassroots music venues never received funding from government prior to this crisis. Most European governments tend not to recognize anything outside of classical and opera music as culture. If this crisis was good for anything, then hopefully to change politicians’ perception of contemporary grassroots music and club culture.
Said Davyd, “There’s a little bit of me that’s kind of angry that we had to wait for this crisis to come along before everybody just agreed on what we already knew: that, actually, if you’ve got a venue near you where artists come through, it’s unbelievably important to these communities and to the artists. It’s nice to see that, finally, maybe, contemporary music, everything that’s been made since 1950, is being recognized as part of our national identity, that it’s important to the kind of country we want to be.”